Re: [PATCH] INSTALL, something about access

On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:11:53PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>...
> I'd say that you can go and commit it. If I find any further
> quibbles, I'll just commit my changes when I get to it. You
> can't break the build with a bogus INSTALL... But, I really
> don't know how RTC works on the SVN project.

According to trunk/COMMITTERS, Sander is CTR for any docs.

> BTW, what would be *really* cool is that if we could enforce
> RTC in SVN itself. Have a pending "commit" queue that requires
> approval from Developer XYZ to be merged into HEAD. That'd be
> so completely rad. Hmm. Something to look at if I ever get the
> time. -- justin

Actually, with some serious legwork, this could be possible. You could build
a full transaction on the server and then leave it for the reviewer. If they
are happy with it, then they can commit the txn.

>From a client standpoint, you do everything except for the final MERGE
request to the server.

("serious legwork" meaning that our client wouldn't be doing it, so you'd
 have to do something to drive much of the commit proces yourself)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org