Hi Karl,
I should have clarified why this is needed. And stated
who reported this, however, I didn't connect 'las3r' to
a name directly ;) [he did report on irc]. Greg suggested
I fixed it, since I was the one las3r had talked to (*grmbl* *grin*).
In any case, the -F is there to specify files. If it is used
in a subcommand other than commit, -F doesn't represent a log
message and therefor we shouldn't complain the 'the log message
file is versioned'. Hence the fix.
Sander
PS. There are some country wide dsl outages going on at the moment.
Hopefully this will be repared soon. Until then I might be a bit
unresponsive (14k modem is not my favourite way of being online).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
> Sent: 27 January 2002 05:15
> To: Sander Striker
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore the fact that a file is versioned when -F is
> passed to a subcommand different then 'commit'
>
>
> "Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org> writes:
> > Here a small patch to only check if the logfile is versioned
> > when the subcommand is commit.
>
> Hmmm... Can you tell us a little more about the motivation? Did you
> run into a situation where you used -F <versioned_file> with some
> command other than commit, and the overeager protection got in your
> way?
>
> Thanks,
> -K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:00 2006