Re: shellscript breakage

Have the alleged Bashisms (or Bournisms) caused anyone a problem? If
so, it's important right now. If not, let's not worry about it.

-K

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > I spotted some bashisms in the testsuite:
> >
> > * The bourne shell syntax for command expansion is `cmd`, not $(cmd)
>
> I am no shell expert, but I don't think $(cmd) is a bashism, it's POSIX
> sh syntax. Is bourne preferred over POSIX?
>
> --
> Philip
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:57 2006