Re: svn commit: rev 879 - trunk/subversion/include trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:

> > If you get all NULLs, you will, yes, be doing translation, but no
> > keywords will be expanded/contracted. So, you *effectively* are doing
> > no translation.
>
> Right; that's what I was thinking, so I was hoping that the actual
> translation step could be avoided. i.e. optimize partway with the !keywords
> as you have, and another step with the check for individual NULLs. (to
> hopefully avoid that timestamp change)

Ah, yes. I see your concern...and raise you about 100 probable bugs
in this new code ;-)

Noted. Will repair.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:56 2006