Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com> writes:
> > Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > > Mid December 2001, but that's not relevant, the problem doesn't lie
> > > with apache :-) I don't expect apache to use the db4 from
> > > /usr/local/subversion/lib, at least, not unless I tell it to.
> >
> > In what sense does the problem not lie with Apache? Do you know where
> > it does lie? I mean, this isn't a showstopper or anything, but it
> > would be nice if we could fix it...
>
> I think he isn't telling httpd where db4 is. So, when apr-util
> compiles, it doesn't find db4, so it doesn't link against it.
> If he were to tell httpd where db4 is, I bet all would be
> well. -- justin
Sure, that's what he said too, as I understand it. And --with-db4 is
recommended in our INSTALL file, too.
But what I'm not understanding is, why should he have to tell httpd
where db4 is? httpd doesn't need db4, only Subversion does, and
Subversion was told where to find it.
In other words, can we have a situation where the db used by httpd and
the db used by Subversion are completely independent?
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:54 2006