Re: svn_fs_open_berkeley
From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-12-18 16:17:46 CET
Yoshiki Hayashi <yoshiki@xemacs.org> writes:
> In commit #661, svn_fs_open_berkeley interface is changed to take
Yep. That's correct.
> Because of this change, the client of svn_fs.h need to be aware that
That's correct. A client of *just* svn_fs.h (not svn_repos.h) will
> This doesn't look too good. Is only canonical way to get svn_fs_t
No. There are two ways to get an svn_fs_t * object.
1. Use svn_fs_new() (and initialize it with svn_fs_open_berkeley).
2. Use svn_repos_open() followed by svn_repos_fs(). In this case,
The fs-tests prove that the FS library needs no Subversion repository
The repos-test binary (and svn, svnadmin, svnlook, etc.) are,
The idea here is that FS API is meants to be modular, and theoretically
Questions/comments are (as always) welcome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.