[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: keywords

From: Alexander Mueller <alex_at_littleblue.de>
Date: 2001-12-14 10:03:02 CET

So what about internationalization?

Id will understand almost everybody.
LastChangedDate sounds like English, probably it is English?

I know, this is kind of heavy. But its not all just Egnlish speaking. And I know a lot of customers that are willing to accept "Id", but never "LastChangedDate".

Ben Collins-Sussman schrieb:

> Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
>
> > The keywords seem awfully lengthy. I'd like to suggest some alternatives:
> >
> > LastChangedRevision -> Revision
> > LastChangedDate -> Date
> > LastChangedBy -> Author
>
> We had the same debate in Chicago. I agree that they're annoyingly
> long, BUT... remember that expanded keywords show up in documents that
> are read by people who know nothing about version control. If they
> see a "$Date: ...$", or "$Author: ...$" in a document, they may think
> that the document was created on a single date or written by a single
> author. The "LastChanged" prefix indicates that the document has
> evolved, via many authors.
>
> Is this silly?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:53 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.