[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: question: repository backups?

From: Dan Berger <dberger_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: 2001-12-11 22:18:52 CET

No - it actually didn't. If anyone has any comments, I'd love to hear
them.

On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:02:35PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Hey, did this old post of yours ever get answered?
>
> All traffic is on the `dev@subversion.tigris.org' list, I don't know
> if anyone's really reading `users' yet...
>
> -Karl
>
> Dan Berger <dberger@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > Hey folks - I've been watching subversion with much interest over the
> > past few months - and I've got a few questions. This may not be the
> > right forum - but it seemed the most logical place.
> >
> > 1. Operational Concerns: One of the nice things about CVS is that the
> > repository is transparent - you can tar it up, move it around, dump it
> > to tape like any other file system - do incremental backups, etc. Can
> > someone on this list discuss how subversion intends to address
> > day-to-day repository maintenance?
> >
> > 2. Client library language bindings: I seem to recall that there's been
> > discussion of client library bindings for C and Python - any plans for
> > Java? I've got a project in front of me that I'm starting to evaluate
> > revision control systems for - and one requirement is a set of Java
> > bindings. Any comment?
> >
> > Any information (even if it's RTFM - and a pointer to a FM that contains
> > these answers) would be appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > --
> > Dan Berger [dberger@ix.netcom.com]
> > http://home.ix.netcom.com/~dberger
> > Inter arma silent leges
> >
> > "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect
> > liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to
> > freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by
> > evil minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in
> > insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without
> > understanding."
> > Justice Louis Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v US (1928)
> >
> > A982 E6B1 CB2F 7A49 843A 9297 DA73 4371 1F54 8D0C

-- 
   Dan Berger [dberger@ix.netcom.com]
   http://home.ix.netcom.com/~dberger
   Inter arma silent leges
   "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect
   liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to
   freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by
   evil minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in
   insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without
   understanding."  
	Justice Louis Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v US (1928)
    A982 E6B1 CB2F 7A49  843A 9297 DA73 4371  1F54 8D0C

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:52 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.