RE: Re: Poll: do we really need newline conversion?
From: Bill Tutt <billtut_at_microsoft.com>
Date: 2001-12-11 19:19:06 CET
Didn't you hear, that's going to be the next feature in Sourcecast after
Bill
-- Bunnies aren't just cute like everybody supposes. They got their hoppy legs and twitchy little noses. And what's with all the carrots, What do they need such good eyesight for anyway? > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:11 AM > To: Bill Tutt > Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org > Subject: Re: Poll: do we really need newline conversion? > > "Bill Tutt" <rassilon@lyra.org> writes: > > As an additional point: With the EOL conversions, and per-file EOL > > styles I could ensure that my data (.dsp files) were correctly > > maintained. How does not doing any EOL conversion prevent somebody from > > committing a bogusly formatted update? > > > > i.e. You're loosing some data integrity guarantees on text files which > > is kind of a bummer. > > That's true -- there are all sorts of application-specific data > integrity guarantees that would be helpful. > > We're also not preventing commits of uncompilable C code. :-) > > -K > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:36:52 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.