Re: OK, so copy is supposed to work now? (as it still isn't, hehe)

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2001-12-06 10:06:07 CET

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> The latter, and yes: it has been biting people periodically, so some doc
> and/or FAQ would be Goodness.

Jay, if you can write up a patch for the project_faq.html, we'll add
it.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:51 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Karl Fogel: "Re: more non constants in struct initializers."
Previous message: Karl Fogel: "Re: browsing the repository"
In reply to: Greg Stein: "Re: OK, so copy is supposed to work now? (as it still isn't, hehe)"
Next in thread: Jay Freeman \(saurik\): "RE: OK, so copy is supposed to work now? (as it still isn't, hehe)"
Reply: Jay Freeman \(saurik\): "RE: OK, so copy is supposed to work now? (as it still isn't, hehe)"
Reply: Greg Hudson: "Re: OK, so copy is supposed to work now? (as it still isn't, hehe)"
Reply: Jay Freeman \(saurik\): "RE: OK, so copy is supposed to work now? (as it still isn't, hehe)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]