[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Using svn with no direct network connection

From: Zack Weinberg <zack_at_codesourcery.com>
Date: 2001-12-04 19:18:40 CET

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:03:11AM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what I would want svn to do to be able to support
> > this set-up, hence the posting ;-).
>
> What you really want is Bitkeeper. In the bitkeeper model (as I
> understand it), every working directory is a repository. Repositories
> are organized hierarchically; your external people could each have their
> own working-dir/repository, and they could all feed into a central
> external repository, which could in turn feed into the internal
> repository. You can generate changesets and mail them upstream for the
> external -> internal step.

Pretty much. There isn't a hierarchy except by convention, though.
Any repository can be "resync"ed against another repository (as long
as they came from the same base) and it has a really spiffy conflict
resolution algorithm. Resyncs can indeed go by e-mail.

I certainly hope a future version of Subversion clones all of that
functionality, it makes all sorts of uses so much easier.

zw

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:51 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.