Re: svn commit: rev 544 - trunk/subversion/bindings/java/jni/org/tigris/subversion/lib

"B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> writes:

> > The accessors would be needless overhead. These are more like structures,
> > rather than objects that would be extended.
> >
> > IMO, keep 'em as attributes.
>
> I'm -1 on this. Structures or not, consistency is king, and reaching
> into another object and touching it's instance variables is not
> consistent with how you should be using Java in the first place, IMO.
>
> I vote +1 for accessors.

If it interests anybody, Ruby does not allow access to
instance variables. The only way is to use accessors.

-- 
Yoshiki Hayashi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org