RE: commit crawler
From: Bill Tutt <billtut_at_microsoft.com>
Date: 2001-11-17 01:49:34 CET
Something similar is required in order to get the correct list of
Bill
-- Bunnies aren't just cute like everybody supposes. They got their hoppy legs and twitchy little noses. And what's with all the carrots, What do they need such good eyesight for anyway? -----Original Message----- From: cmpilato@collab.net [mailto:cmpilato@collab.net] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:34 AM To: sussman@collab.net Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org Subject: commit crawler Hey, Ben. Was wondering what you thought about us changing the commit crawler so that mined information from the working copy first, storing relavent bits in some applicable in-memory data structure and locking dirs and such, then blew through that data structure to perform the actual commit. Reason I ask is that I'd like to recycle alot of the logic in that commit process, but for working-copy-free commits (like `svn cp' is soon to do). It'd be great if svn_wc_crawl_local_mods simply generated some Thing that, when passed to a commit editor driver, could perform a commit. That way our working-copy-less commits could simply manufacture their own Things, and pass those off to the same driver. Plus, I think it would help the commit crawler not be such a mess, to seperate the local-mod search from the commit process itself. Just polling for thoughts here. Lemme know. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:36:48 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.