[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why didn't this build get ra_local as well as ra_dav?

From: B. W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2001-11-03 14:35:15 CET

> Hmmm, something weird just happened on my home Debian box...
> I have Berkeley in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3, and I configured
> Subversion like this:
> ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode \
> --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs \
> --with-berkeley-db=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3
> I'll spare you most of the configure spew, but suffice it to say that
> it found Berkeley just fine:
> [...]
> checking for Berkeley DB in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3... yes
> [...]
> Yet when I built, I got an svn binary for only ra_dav, no ra_local:

This happened to me on Thursday. I took the heavy handed approach and
did 'make clean' then 'make distclean' and then started over with
autogen.sh. That did the trick for me, but I'll bet it just makes Greg



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:47 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.