Re: XEmacs binding
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: 2001-10-29 13:15:13 CET
On 29 Oct 2001, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
[Uh, I'm no lawyer either]
> Again, licensing issue comes into play. As IANAL, I don't really
Why would you restrict the amount of users just because you pick a license
> According to GNU GPL 2, you cannot distribute XEmacs executable linked
That is probably because of the announcement clause (BSD-style) right?
> (FSF says nothing about Subversion license but I guess it is also free
I'd say so too.
> WORKAROUND
That would be a sever blow in the face of the RPM users of the world and
> 2. Some says dlopen()'ed library is not derivative of the
That is not what the GNU FAQ says. If you have an API more complex that just
> I'm thinking about adding Subversion module to XEmacs and allow you to
Why not use the plain modified BSD (without the announcement clause)? It
-- Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77 ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:36:46 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.