[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status behaviour

From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin_at_pilch-bisson.net>
Date: 2001-10-22 19:56:51 CEST

On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:53:24PM +0200, Branko ?ibej wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
>
> >
> >Well, if no one complained about the issue, I will check it in. One more
> >question. Should it print the ? even if there is only one target? I am
> >beginning to think yes.
> >
> I think so, too. Also if the target is (implicit) "." and the directory
> contains unversioned files.
>
> Of course, the svn:ignore property should do it's stuff, too. :-)
>
Ahh, good points, that is going to require a little bit more work, but I'm on
it.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:45 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.