[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [non]recursive semantics revisited.

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-10-22 17:48:02 CEST

Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
> We had previously agreed that the semantics of non-recursive for directories
> would be:
> run command on dir and all file entries in dir. Do nothing with dirs.
> I would like to make an ammendment to that. Consider property subcommands,=
> and=20
> the revert command. That would mean that there is no way to run a property
> or revert command on just a directory, which I think is bogus. So I thought
> of this proposal.=20
> 1) For commands that are recursive by default (checkout, import, update, et=
> c),
> use the behaviour described above.
> 2) For commands that are _nonrecursive_ by default (plist, pget, pset, pdel,
> revert) run command only on dir.

I thought that's what we always meant, so fine. :-)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:45 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.