Re: Packaging issues - dependent packages

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:16:19PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > +1
> >
> > i am also very much in favor of the neon patch, and would like to see it
> > go in before the next milestone, as it would make a lot of hacks i'll
> > have to do for the freebsd port go away if i can just use the
> > installed version of neon.
>
> +1 on the enhancement.
>
> -1 on getting it in before M5, which is being released right now (or
> did you mean Alpha?).

i would have prefered before M5, but i didn't know it was today...

time flies when you aren't paying attention ;-(

actually though, this will probably make the freebsd port come out
sooner, since i won't have to get the version of neon in the tree
updated, but it'll have to have a few more hacks in it to handle
installing its own version of neon. not a big deal though.

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org