Re: Packaging issues - dependent packages

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:14:25AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
>
> > Long term I would prefer to see neon, bdb, apr, (and if greg ever adds it)
> > apr-util all be separate packages that subversion depends on. For the short
> > term its easy to have them included, although there is an outstanding patch
> > that would give us the same flexibility we have with bdb for neon, which
> > I like the idea of.
>
> +2
>
> One of my votes is from a fellow CollabNet engineer, who I found out
> was astonished that we require these libraries to be in a certain
> subdirectory (apr/, neon/) rather than providing the --with-neon= and
> --with-apr= configure options, and defaulting to system installations.

+1

i am also very much in favor of the neon patch, and would like to see it
go in before the next milestone, as it would make a lot of hacks i'll
have to do for the freebsd port go away if i can just use the
installed version of neon.

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org