On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:11:11PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > * if the editor receives a change that is *below* the editor's
> > > 'target', and nonrecursive is set, then ignore the change.
> > Well I did this part a little differently. I actually pass the recurse arg
> > all the way through the reporter to svn_repos_dir_delta. That way, we only
> > tell the server about immediate children, and the server only tells us about
> > immediate children.
> Whoa there; that's a huge change. Did you actually rewrite
> svn_repos_dir_delta? Last I heard, this function was incapable of
> acting nonrecursively. If so, major kudos to you. That's a big chunk
> of work!
Yes I did :) Actually the hard part wasn't re-writing svn_repos_dir_delta.
The hard part was getting the argument to it via both ra_local and ra_dav.
Done now though. Just attempting to write a monster log message.
Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net
"Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:45 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored