Good points. Let's start out with the `execute' bit, and add others
as demand indicates. I.e., not try to anticipate what is useful,
instead see what people actually have a use for.
-K
Branko =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=C8ibej?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >Hmm... I think SVN should only worry about the "execute" bit. That is really
> >the only interesting mode. For r/w, we should just use 0666 as modified by
> >the current umask.
> >
> I agree. But I think we will have to have system-specific bits: the
> "execute" bit only makes sense on Unix, on Windows we'd probably want to
> remember "system" and "hidden" (and possibly "compressed", although
> that's going a bit far).
>
>
> --
> Brane �ibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:44 2006