Re: svn status proposal
From: Bruce Atherton <bruce_at_hagbard.flair.law.ubc.ca>
Date: 2001-09-25 01:05:27 CEST
At 04:21 PM 9/24/2001 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> [ ] Yes, always include the local rev.
Umm... I hate to do this but
[X] No, the local rev is usually a distraction, please show it
Was that idea shot down previously for some reason I missed?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.