Re: svn status proposal

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>The question is:
>
> Should all status output show the same (or very similar format),
> that is, always including the local revision number? Or should the
> default not show the local rev, and you get the rev when you invoke
> st --verbose, which also happens to list all entries?
>
> [ ] Yes, always include the local rev.
>
> [X] No, the local rev is usually a distraction, please show it
> only with --verbose.
>
+1 for having a short format by default.

>I don't see any point confining this vote to committers only, as it's
>a UI issue not a technical implementation issue; I hope it's all right
>with all the committers if we just accept votes from anyone who
>happens to be subscribed to this list right now (?).
>
O.K.

-- 
Brane �ibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>            http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org