[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status proposal

From: RADICS Peter <mitch_at_lbcons.net>
Date: 2001-09-24 21:53:22 CEST

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:44:40PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> RADICS Peter <mitch@lbcons.net> writes:
> > - no asterix please. a letter code would be a lot more usable
> > (Added, Removed, Modified/Patched/Updated/Whatever)
> Remember that a lot of these don't apply. The only possible codes are
> Modified and Removed in this context. Whether they're worth
> distinguishing is another question; I could go either way on that.

hm.. don't we get notified of files present in the repo, but not in our
working copy? (Added) I think that would be necessary if we want to use
svn st -u to find out what would happen with an update.


// RADICS Peter <mitch_at_lbcons.net> (http://lbcons.net)
// "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, 
//  their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.