[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status proposal

From: RADICS Peter <mitch_at_lbcons.net>
Date: 2001-09-24 21:30:29 CEST

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:34:14PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Karl and I don't think that the -v and -u flags should imply one
> another in *any* direction. I don't want my 'svn st -u' to show me
> every single file under version control. I want it to show me only
> "interesting" entries -- only those with local mods and/or
> out-of-dateness.
> Please, independent of how many output formats there may be, let's not
> comingle these switches.

+1 on that. actually, to summarize my prefs:
- svn st: short output
- -u, -v separate switches, not implying one-another
- no strong opinion about the verboseness of plain -u. could be same
  layout as plain -v (with plain -v using spaces where the
  out-of-dateness would be displayed in the -u case)
- no asterix please. a letter code would be a lot more usable
  (Added, Removed, Modified/Patched/Updated/Whatever)



// RADICS Peter <mitch_at_lbcons.net> (http://lbcons.net)
// "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, 
//  their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.