Re: svn status proposal

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:34:14PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> Karl and I don't think that the -v and -u flags should imply one
> another in *any* direction. I don't want my 'svn st -u' to show me
> every single file under version control. I want it to show me only
> "interesting" entries -- only those with local mods and/or
> out-of-dateness.
>
> Please, independent of how many output formats there may be, let's not
> comingle these switches.

+1 on that. actually, to summarize my prefs:
- svn st: short output
- -u, -v separate switches, not implying one-another
- no strong opinion about the verboseness of plain -u. could be same
  layout as plain -v (with plain -v using spaces where the
  out-of-dateness would be displayed in the -u case)
- no asterix please. a letter code would be a lot more usable
  (Added, Removed, Modified/Patched/Updated/Whatever)

[SNIP]

cheers,
mitch

-- 
// RADICS Peter <mitch_at_lbcons.net> (http://lbcons.net)
//
// "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, 
//  their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org