[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status proposal

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-24 17:22:24 CEST

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> Okay, thanks for all the feedback on status output format. I'm
> responding to Greg's mail here, but have read the whole thread.

A summary of the Ben/Karl position:

  * 'svn st' shows only local mods (no network access)

  * 'svn st -u' shows local mods and *adds* network info as well.

  * 'svn st -v' shows all entries (no network access).

Here's what's different from my earlier summary, which Karl and I are
now advocating:

  1. the -v flag does *not* imply the -u flag; they are independent.
      (It's reasonable to think that somebody may want to know exactly
       what is under revision control -- without bugging the network.)

  2. we really want a single output format. (see Karl's previous mail)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.