Re: svn status proposal

Greg Stein wrote:

>On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:06:33PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>
>Yes. :-)
>
>Ben had an excellent proposal. It fit typical usage, it had good output
>formats, it was very easy to understand, it didn't introduce a lot of
>switches, etc etc etc.
>
I agree with Greg here. We've already been introducing switches without
enough thought -- the -M switch is a good example of the "hey, can I do
that? let's do it" approach.

+1 for Ben's proposal. It definitely doesn't suffer from the
design-by-committe syndrome, if that worries you: he got only gentle
guidance from the rest of us. :-)

-- 
Brane �ibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>            http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org