> From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@manyfish.co.uk]
> Sent: 19 September 2001 01:45
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:12:10AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > > Time for that use-APR-in-Neon patch :-)
> >
> > Well, I'll take that task*, together with getting client auth
> ssl working
> > in subversion (currently I tripped over another segv in mod_ssl :( ).
> >
> > *) If people want me to. Joe, Greg, thoughts?
>
> Personally I'm not that interested in seeing neon use APR, though I
> might apply a patch if it's squeaky clean and I can be convinced there
> are no licensing issues (it will of course have to be an optional layer;
> neon will always work without APR). It would mean more complexity, and
> in this case, only to work around a deeper API issue, the need for this
> temp file in the first place.
>
> joe
Well, I was thinking something more radical: use of pools, registering
cleanups etc. The temp file problem being solved is just a side-effect
of consistent usage of apr. If this is too much, I'll go and do something
else. This just seemed a good project to get into the inner workings of
neon aswell :)
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006