[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: state-of-union #2

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2001-09-18 01:15:40 CEST

On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
 
> I'd advise using the bundled copy of neon in your SVN port until the
> neon API is stable, unless you are prepared to deal with API
> compatibility issues.

it depends how unstable the neon api is... the only real reason i
wanted to move to the ports version of neon is that currently my port
installs the neon-config binary over the top of the one which is
installed on the system already. if you think it would be better (for
now anyway) to just hack around this in the port, i can certainly do
that.

how much has the neon API been changing lately? is it a lot, or are
you just trying to keep your options open until neon hits 1.0?

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.