[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-14 05:14:41 CEST

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:

> I think I'm in agreement with Joe, and would certainly appreciate an "svn
> status" that is entirely local and only talks about what I've done in my WC.
> (1) what did I change?
> (2) what is out of date?

Okay, we all agree on these use cases. Case 1 is entirely local, and
case 2 requires network.

You guys seem to be advocating that we split these two tasks into
different subcommands; that being able to run case 1 sans network is a
huge huge deal, and thus justifies the split.

I'm not going to argue that it's important to keep the use-cases
combined; I only posted that exerpt from the spec because I had
assumed that we were all still at that original starting point. :-)

If we split 1 and 2 into two different subcommands, what would they be
called? Could their output still be similar?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.