[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?

From: Joe Orton <joe_at_manyfish.co.uk>
Date: 2001-09-14 00:06:50 CEST

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 02:07:07PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> Case (1) is more common, I'd say. How often do people want to see what is
> new, but *not* pull it down? IMO, the typically pattern is:
> (edit, edit, edit)
> $ svn status
> (figure out commit msg)
> $ svn commit
> $ svn up
> (repeat)

This is exactly how I've been using svn (hacked so that "svn status" ==
"svn status -M", and getting rid of the remote repos revision stuff)

Speaking as someone who is often many hops from the server, having an
"svn status" command which is a local thing is a genuine gift from the


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.