Re: new Subversion tarball posted

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:30:24AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> Now that the install-includes rule is fixed, would you like us (me) to
> post a newer tarball? It would be nice if your FreeBSD port doesn't
> have to hack around the problem in r88.

if you want to post one, that's fine, but it isn't vital. i'm not
submitting this for inclusion in the ports tree until M4, and i
imagine there will be many other fixes that go in between now and
then.

in any case, i probably won't be able to get a new port rolled until
monday night, as i'm in massachussetts for a funeral, and won't have
access to any of my FreeBSD machines until i get back.

thanks,

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org