Re: update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-13 19:45:53 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> I agree, right now "-M" is only printing (M)odified and (C)onflicted
> files. But I believe that scheduling an object for (A)ddition,
> (D)eletion or (R)eplacement should show up with this flag as well.
> They're all local modifications in their own way. I can make this
> change if others agree.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: : "(no subject)"
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?"
Maybe in reply to: Mo DeJong: "update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?"
Next in thread: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: update vs status, where should local mods be displayed?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]