Re: FreeBSD port of Subversion, take 1

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 09:54:02AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>
> > note that if you guys could roll a release soon, it would probably be
> > better to submit this to FreeBSD with a newer version, since IIRC some
> > pretty annoying bugs have been fixed since M3
>
> I may try to take care of this today (issue 478 -- rewrite our dish.sh
> script to use svn, not cvs!).
>
> I mean, if you're really going to release a FreeBSD port, it's kind of
> a pseudo-advertisement. We should put our best tarball forward.

that's great. it won't take much to switch to an updated tarball.

the one thing i still want to work on is making sure subversion's
libraries (neon and apr) don't spam over other ones... is there any
reason we need to use the version of neon that's in the tree? i would
like to be able to make the port use the installed version if at all
possible. apr is less of an issue, since so few apps use it at the
moment.

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org