[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

db linkage -- better, but still not quite right.

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-05 18:06:39 CEST

Well, Kevin... so after your build-system changes last night, I was
able to build statically again. Plain old -ldb showed up in my link

The problem: my *system* has DB 3.2 installed, as
/usr/local/lib/libdb.so and libdb.a. This is what the linker used,
instead of the 3.3.11 tree that was unpacked in my svn tree. This was
deadly, because I had no idea this happened, and suddenly my binaries
couldn't read any repositories. It took me a few minutes to figure
out the problem. :-)

So... can we make static linkage aware of the local db tree?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:40 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.