Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: . ...

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> We don't want people to do a "cvs up", get a skewed APR, and then submit bug
> reports to this list. We are shipping with a specific APR and a specific
> Neon.

Yeah -- that's sensible. Change made; thanks for the suggestion!

> And you say "for developers" ... but this tarball is not for us. It is a
> distribution tarball. I have never seen CVS dirs in a distro. Including them
> may set the wrong expectation ("hey, I can get a newer APR"), which could
> backfire on us.

Yup, +1.

> Note that we should also be referencing a specific Apache, too; possibly
> providing a tarball of that one.
>
> [ and note that we can/should tag the httpd and APR trees ]

Hmmm. That's weird, though if you want to tag, go ahead. The idea
that a given project gets tagged for every other release out there
that depends on it would result in a lot of tags...

Of course, if the first project were under Subversion, it wouldn't
matter, since you can just refer to a specific revision (i.e., a free
tag).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:36 2006