On 2001-08-06 04:13:22 Greg Stein wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:59:13PM +0100, peter.westlake@arm.com wrote:
...
>> - the main problem area of CVS that Subversion does not (yet) appear to
>> improve upon is modules.
>
>We've talked about it, but will deal with the issues after M3. We have
some
>hard work to do, and this can be deferred. I know a lot of people have
taken
>the time to respond to this, chewing up cycles :-), but we'll really be
>spending the time on this later.
Understood! Many thanks to all the people who replied. My main question
about
modules has been answered: it is clearly possible in principle to add the
functions I need to Subversion in a clean way.
Next week, after my holiday, I shall carry on studying the source in the
hope of understanding it sufficiently to make a contribution after 1.0 is
released and debugged. I'll also think about use cases to explain clones
to people who are used to branches and tags.
Thanks,
Peter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:35 2006