Re: RFC: Delta indexing and composition

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>>In any case, our schema is flexible enough that we can implement
>>out-of-DB storage on top of it (e.g., by extending the semantics of
>>string keys to include external references). But personally I'd like to
>>keep the option of having the whole thing in a single database, because
>>it's much handier for smaller repositories.
>>
>
>I don't see how it's handier, actually, but don't mean to start an
>argument by that (just not seeing your meaning, is all). But agree we
>shouldn't bother with it right now.
>

Now that I think about it, it's not really handier, it's just that /I/
find it neater to have everyting in one place. Forget it. :-)

-- 
Brane �ibej
    home:   <brane_at_xbc.nu>             http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
    work:   <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>   http://www.hermes-softlab.com/
     ACM :   <brane_at_acm.org>            http://www.acm.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org