[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs deltification

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-07-03 20:21:27 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> It's killing me. :-(
> I spent less time on this in the last few weeks than I should have,
> and the bloody thing is turning out to be a real bore. The theory is
> sound, and the algorithm I wrote in fs-improvements also, but fiddling
> with all those offsets is not something I'd recommend to anyone.
> (Yes, I should have posted an update about this earlier; sorry about that.)
> Anyway, I was too optimistic last time when I said it's just a few
> days away.

Hey, don't worry about it. I was just mailing to see if you had
something ready -- since you don't, we'll just start from where we
were, no problem.

I think it's okay to sacrifice some performance in order to get this
up and running. The immediate priority is that *storage* be
deltified. Beyond that, making retrieval of deltified revisions
efficient (esp in terms of memory usage) is good, but not worth
delaying M3 for, imho. The interfaces are clean, so improvements on
the back end are always going to be possible.

Okay, enough talk, just needed to know where you were. I'm off
into code now. :-)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:32 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.