[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Minor patch for Makefile.in

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-06-04 21:08:01 CEST

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:08:55PM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote:
> > Is it really such a good idea to try to invent a new
> > build system so close to the time you want to release
> > something? I know the old system was not perfect,
> > but at least it already worked.
> A good chunk of us agreed that we wanted to see a new system like this. Once
> you have agreement on the end goal, then it is a matter of what an
> *individual* chooses to do. This is, after all, a volunteer effort :-)

Absolutely +1, yes.

> Yes, I'm sure that Karl would prefer that I worked on something else, but
> this has been a good breather for me right now.

Well, there's some truth to that speculation, but hey, volunteers work
on what they want, when they want. If I or someone else is ever
really dissatisfied, we should start committing on libsvn_ra_dav and
mod_dav_svn ourselves. :-)

For the record, my sole issue with the timing of the new build system
is that for while it had an impact on *other's* ability to do
develoment (i.e., people other than Greg Stein), while its bugs were
being shaken out. However, Greg's response time on these issues has
been about three milliseconds lately, and everyone appears to be able
to build again, so I have returned to my usual state of sessile bliss.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:31 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.