Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: . ...

Greg Stein wrote:

>>I expect the makefiles you generate won't depend on GNU make, and that
>>we'll finally be able to build Subversion with something other than gcc,
>>right? :-)
>>
>
>Correct on all parts.
>
>I use Linux, so I've got gmake, which means I can't really tell if I
>accidentally use a gmake-only facility. But I'm not going to be coding
>anything more complicated than an "include". And there are only two forms of
>doing an include, which autoconf will detect (we've got the logic in APR
>already).
>
Not to worry, I'll test on Solaris, HP-UX and AIX. If it passes all
three, there's probably not a make in existence that'd break.

>Rather than using gcc for dependency generation, it will be a simple scan
>for #include files in the sources.
>
I'm trying to remember how many times I'd written such a script before
... Once per project, I guess. :-) I'm sure I have a perl version lying
around somewhere, yell if you'd like to see it.

-- 
Brane �ibej
    home:   <brane_at_xbc.nu>             http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
    work:   <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>   http://www.hermes-softlab.com/
     ACM:   <brane_at_acm.org>            http://www.acm.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org