Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: client ...

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:32:22AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
>
> > I am guessing that the difference has to do with whether or not we make
> > a change to the parent entries file? We shouldn't have to anyway should
> > we? I thought that the entry in the parent dir just contained the name,
> > and all the info was in the THIS_DIR entry within the child dir.
>
> Perhaps reading the big ol' docstring for svn_wc_get_actual_update_target
> in libsvn_wc/get_editor.c would help. I don't feel like I'm likely to
> explain it much better than I did in that comment.
>
That did the trick for me. I hadn't considered the case where a dir had
been removed and replaced with a file.

Will try to think about how to go about doing that via the condense
targets route, but not sure how much bandwidth I can give to it for a
while.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~