[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Change #6

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2001-03-30 21:49:11 CEST

>> As I mentioned to Ben just now, it is relatively straightforward to
>> have a forked stream.

> Yeah, that's one of the ways I was thinking. Should be pretty easy.

It may be easy, but it's not very efficient. A push model forces both
composed editors to keep in sync with the data they need from the
stream; a pull model with a forked stream means potentially reading
the whole stream into memory (or into a temporary file) because the
two composed editors could read from it at vastly different rates.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:26 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.