Re: CVS update: subversion/subversion/libsvn_fs tree.c

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> > + /* ### kff todo: is there any compelling reason to get the nodes in
> > + one db transaction? Right now we don't; txn_body_get_root() gets
> > + one node at a time. */
>
> I don't think so. They're all readonly, and the algorithm allows for them to
> move/shift as they will. There isn't an invariant that they are all
> synchronized in some fashion, so there isn't a need to ensure they are read
> in one, synchronous shot.

There's no guarantee that they're all readonly. They could all be txn
roots, for all we know.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:26 2006