Re: CVS update: subversion/subversion/libsvn_fs tree.c

On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:59:15PM -0000, kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
>...
> --- tree.c 2001/03/23 01:21:52 1.65
> +++ tree.c 2001/03/26 19:59:15 1.66
>...
> + /* ### kff todo: is there any compelling reason to get the nodes in
> + one db transaction? Right now we don't; txn_body_get_root() gets
> + one node at a time. */

I don't think so. They're all readonly, and the algorithm allows for them to
move/shift as they will. There isn't an invariant that they are all
synchronized in some fashion, so there isn't a need to ensure they are read
in one, synchronous shot.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/