Re: Check min and max num targets in client args patch.

"B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> writes:
> Urk... that's a *really* good point. It's obvious that we need to
> rethink this argument processing... I'm going to take a step back and
> try and formulate (in English) exactly what we need to handle/provide
> here, and then try and code from there. I'm thinking that a more
> holistic approach is required here (one approach that takes into
> account all the cases) instead of a bunch of different techniques.

Good -- that's really needed, I think. :-)
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:25 2006