Re: Copy node vs copy property (was Re: CVS update ...)

Yoshiki Hayashi <yoshiki@xemacs.org> writes:
> I'm a bit confused. What do you mean by entirey client-side
> approach? Somehow the information where copy node has been
> copied from must be stored in filesystem?

I believe Jim means that

   $ svn copy foo.c bar.c

adds a copy property to bar.c, so that when bar.c is committed, it
simply _has_ the requisite property without the fs doing any extra
work. I.e., for the fs, the copy properties would be read-only data.
The source would always be the client.

-K
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:25 2006