On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:14:11AM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Mo DeJong wrote:
> > Am I saying a test suite should be written in sh? No, clearly not. But if
> > we are going to depend on something, the toplevel configure should take
> > care of it.
> ... and what if [Perl/Python/Tcl/sh] or a combination of them aren't present
> in your build system? We can hardly fail miserably since we can compile,
> build and run fine without them (not without sh though).
> I'd say we're fine to output a nice message saying "you need at least version
> X of language Y to run the test suite" instead. We could have a warning
> displayed in the configure script.
+1 for this. I don't see that the vast majority of users will ever run
the test suite. So the important things to worry about are:
1) Is it easy enough to use to get our job done?
2) Is it widely available enough that it will _probably_ be installed at
> Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77
> ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net
"Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:25 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored