John P Cavanaugh writes:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:23:33PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote:
> > On 7 Mar 2001, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > Many systems come with Perl, many do not. The problem shows
> > up when you depend on having that piece of software
> > installed before yours will work. This is even more
> > critical when it comes to your tests cases. Suppose
> > you run the test cases and they all fail. What is
> > at fault? Is the version of Perl (or whatever,
> > I am not attacking Perl here) installed on the system
> > broken? Is Perl installed at all? Is it a different
> > version than your test cases expected? Is it your code?
> I just have a hard time believing that systems where subversion will
> be *built* and *tested* dont have perl. I understand systems where
> subversion will be installed not having perl, but development systems???
> But I absolutely agree with not placing requirements on specific perl
> modules not included in core. Thats definitely a no-no.
Massive agreement here.
> > > It seems like you're worrying about extreme edge-cases.
> > I don't think they are edge cases. If you want to
> > depend on Perl then it should be included in the
> > source tree.
> Well why dont we include the source for gcc, make, autoconf,
> /bin/sh, etc.
Hey, my new Sarcaso-Meter just pegged. Good to know it works. :P
> --John Cavanaugh
Lee P. W. Burgess <<!>> Manipulate eternity. Power is a symphony:
Programmer <<!>> elaborate, enormous, essential.
Red Bean Software <<!>> Dream the moment with a fiddle in summer
firstname.lastname@example.org <<!>> and a knife in winter.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:25 2006