Re: CVS update: subversion/notes delta.dtd

On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:40:09PM -0600, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> ghudson@tigris.org writes:
>
> > User: ghudson
> > Date: 01/03/05 10:26:29
> >
> > Added: notes delta.dtd
> > Log:
> > DTD for tree deltas. Written by Branko back in September 2000. I
> > think it's still correct.
>
> It's no longer correct (sorry). I made some changes a while back that
> involved changes to the DTD. I'm not familiar enough with DTD layouts
> to make the edits myself, but I will try to, in the very near future,
> summarize the differences between the DTD you just checked in, and
> what's really going on in the code.

Actually, I only needed the following patch to get all the
tests/xml/*.xml documents to validate:

Index: delta.dtd
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/subversion/notes/delta.dtd,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 delta.dtd
--- delta.dtd 2001/03/05 18:26:29 1.1
+++ delta.dtd 2001/03/05 22:33:42
@@ -37,10 +37,12 @@
 <!ATTLIST dir
   ancestor CDATA #IMPLIED
   ver CDATA #IMPLIED
+ base-rev CDATA #IMPLIED
>
 <!ELEMENT file ((prop-delta, (text-delta | text-delta-ref)?) |
                 ((text-delta | text-delta-ref), prop-delta?))?>
 <!ATTLIST file
   ancestor CDATA #IMPLIED
   ver CDATA #IMPLIED
+ base-rev CDATA #IMPLIED
>

Are there other documents that would show the changes more?
        sam th
        sam@uchicago.edu
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
        GnuPG Key:
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key